|
There is no doubt that Iraq needs military and security assistance, at least in the short term. It would be unrealistic to tell the US-led international forces to leave the war-torn country immediately. Even the staunch anti-US politicians have said that a hasty withdrawal could very well lead to a bloody civil war and possibly the fragmentation of the country. However, the fact remains the US is an occupying power and must leave.
The proposed Iraqi-American security pact, which is currently being negotiated, can help Iraq in theory but not in the way the US is insisting on. Washington seems to seek an agreement that would make its occupation of Iraq legal beyond the December 31, 2008 UN mandate. And according to reports, the Bush administration is forcing upon the Iraqis several articles in the proposed agreement that would wipe out any remaining aspect of Iraq's sovereignty.
The proposed deal would also give the US the right to use Iraqi territory and space to launch military operations in and outside the country without prior approval. Also, it would place Iraq's supposedly sovereign security and military institutions under US command.
Suspicion is running deep in the Nouri Al Maliki government as well as its political opponents that the US wishes to seek permanent bases and keep thousands of troops in the country. Many Iraqis are wary of signing a long-term agreement with the "occupying forces" and believe America is there for economic, military and political control.
Iraqis should not be rushed into signing an agreement that fundamentally effects the future of their country. Iraq needs help but it should come within an international, and most importantly, an Arab framework that guarantees above all its independence and unity. Oblivious to the Iraqi dilemma for years, it is time the Arab League stepped in to preserve Arab interests in that important Arab country.
|
