Given the controversies surrounding Iran's nuclear programme, the manner with which the issue is tackled is important. The standoff should be dealt with taking into consideration all the factors involved. Never should the issue be turned into a platform for confrontation between the parties involved.
The European Union (EU) recently approved new sanctions against Iran. The United States will also be joining hands with the EU on this. Imposing these tough, independent sanctions is aimed at targeting the country's energy sector and will be seen as a step towards countering the opposition voiced by Russia and China.
It is true that Iran has for too long managed to engage the international community in a cat and mouse game with regard to its nuclear programme.
Neither has Iran agreed on full discussions under the auspices of international law and international organisations, nor has it clearly communicated its intentions, as well as commitments, with regard to the issue.
But it is also a fact that many in the West - including the US and Britain - have attempted to forge their own policy towards Iran, one that deviates from that of the international community and the course of action opted by the United Nations.
But since the issue involves a nuclear programme in one of the most sensitive regions, it would require greater care and attention.
The controversial Iranian nuclear programme and the disputes surrounding it should not lead to a confrontation between the opposing parties.
In fact, imposing sanctions that are separate from the UN mandate sets a precedent as it allows a group of nations to take a collective action based on their opinion on the issue. The question truly is whether such a move would really work.
